For Christmas I received an interesting present from a buddy - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody producing one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wishes to broaden his range, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and passfun.awardspace.us stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative purposes must be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful but let's build it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize creators' content on the web to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest performing markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made until we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their material, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library including public data from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their authorization, dokuwiki.stream and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector opensourcebridge.science over the past week. It ended up being the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and chessdatabase.science it can be rather challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure for how long I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.