Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing education while making finding out more accessible however also stimulating disputes on its impact.

While trainees hail AI tools like ChatGPT for enhancing their knowing experience, speakers are raising issues about the growing reliance on AI, which they argue fosters laziness and undermines scholastic stability, particularly with many students not able to protect their projects or given works.

Prof. Isaac Nwaogwugwu, a speaker at the University of Lagos, in an interview with Nairametrics, revealed frustration over the growing reliance on AI-generated actions among students stating a current experience he had.

RelatedStories

Avoid sharing personal information that can recognize you with AI tools- Expert cautions

Chinese AI app DeepSeek stimulates international tech selloff, obstacles U.S. AI supremacy

"I gave a project to my MBA students, and out of over 100 students, about 40% submitted the specific same answers. These students did not even know each other, but they all used the exact same AI tool to generate their reactions," he stated.

He kept in mind that this trend prevails amongst both undergraduate and postgraduate trainees however is specifically worrying in part-time and range knowing programs.

"AI is a serious difficulty when it concerns assignments. Many students no longer believe critically-they simply go online, produce responses, and send," he included.

Surprisingly, some speakers are likewise implicated of over-relying on AI, setting a cycle where both educators and students turn to AI for convenience rather than intellectual rigor.

This debate raises critical questions about the function of AI in academic stability and student advancement.

According to a UNESCO report, while ChatGPT reached 100 million regular monthly active users in January 2023, only one nation had actually released regulations on generative AI since July 2023.

As of December 2024, ChatGPT had more than 300 million people utilizing the AI chatbot each week and 1 billion messages sent out every day around the globe.

Decline of academic rigor

University speakers are significantly concerned about trainees sending AI-generated tasks without really comprehending the material.

Dr. Felix Echekoba, a lecturer at Nnamdi Azikiwe University, expressed his issues to Nairametrics about trainees progressively counting on ChatGPT, only to deal with addressing standard concerns when tested.

"Many students copy from ChatGPT and send polished assignments, but when asked fundamental concerns, they go blank. It's frustrating because education has to do with discovering, not simply passing courses," he stated.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu explained that the increasing variety of first-rate graduates can not be totally associated to AI however admitted that even high-performing trainees utilize these tools.
"A first-class trainee is a first-class student, AI or not, however that does not mean they don't cheat. The advantages of AI might be peripheral, however it is making trainees dependent and less analytical," he said.

- Another speaker, Dr. Ereke, from Ebonyi State University, raised a various concern that some speakers themselves are guilty of the exact same practice.
"It's not just trainees using AI lazily. Some lecturers, out of their own laziness, produce lesson notes, course outlines, marking plans, and even test concerns with AI without reviewing them. Students in turn utilize AI to produce responses. It's a cycle of laziness and it is killing genuine knowing," he regreted.

Students' perspectives on use

Students, on the other hand, say AI has improved their knowing experience by making academic materials more reasonable and accessible.

- Eniola Arowosafe, a 300-level Business Administration student at Unilag, shared how AI has significantly helped her learning by breaking down complex terms and supplying summaries of lengthy texts.
"AI assisted me understand things more easily, particularly when dealing with complex subjects," she explained.

However, she recalled a circumstances when she utilized AI to submit her task, just for her speaker to instantly acknowledge that it was generated by ChatGPT and reject it. Eniola noted that it was a good-bad effect.

- Bryan Okwuba, who just recently finished with a first-rate degree in Pharmacy Technology from the University of Lagos, firmly thinks that his academic success wasn't due to any AI tool. He associates his exceptional grades to actively appealing by asking concerns and concentrating on locations that lecturers stress in class, as they are frequently shown in exam questions.
"It's everything about existing, paying attention, and taking advantage of the wealth of understanding shared by my associates," he said,

- Tunde Awoshita, a final-year marketing trainee at UNIZIK, confesses to sometimes copying directly from ChatGPT when dealing with several deadlines.
"To be truthful, there are times I copy straight from ChatGPT when I have multiple deadlines, and I know I'm guilty of that, many times the speakers do not get to review them, but AI has actually also helped me learn quicker."

Balancing AI's function in education

Experts think the solution depends on AI literacy; teaching students and speakers how to use AI as a knowing aid instead of a shortcut.

- Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, highlighted the combination of AI into Nigeria's education system, worrying the value of a balanced method that maintains human involvement while harnessing AI to improve finding out results.
"As we navigate the rapidly evolving landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI), it is important that we prioritise human company in education. We must guarantee that AI improves, rather than replaces, educators' vital function in shaping young minds," he stated

Concerns over AI in Learning

Dorcas Akintade, forum.batman.gainedge.org a cybersecurity transformation expert, attended to growing issues concerning using expert system (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and their possible risks to the academic system.

- She acknowledged the benefits of AI, forums.cgb.designknights.com however, highlighted the need for caution in its usage.
- Akintade highlighted the increasing resistance amongst teachers and schools toward integrating AI tools in learning environments. She recognized two main reasons AI tools are discouraged in instructional settings: security risks and plagiarism. She described that AI tools like ChatGPT are trained to react based on user interactions, which might not align with the expectations of teachers.
"It is not looking at it as a tutor," Akintade said, explaining that AI does not cater to particular teaching approaches.

Plagiarism is another issue, as AI pulls from existing information, often without appropriate attribution

"A great deal of people need to comprehend, like I stated, this is data that has actually been trained on. It is not just bringing things out from the sky. It's bringing details that some other people are fed into it, which in essence suggests that is another individual's documentation," she cautioned.

- Additionally, Akintade highlighted an early problem in AI development understood as "hallucination," where AI tools would generate information that was not accurate.
"Hallucination suggested that it was drawing out info from the air. If ChatGPT could not get that info from you, it was going to make one up," she described.

She recommended "grounding" AI by supplying it with particular info to avoid such mistakes.

Navigating AI in Education

Akintade argued that prohibiting AI tools outright is not the option, especially when AI provides a chance to leapfrog traditional educational methods.

- She thinks that consistently reinforcing crucial info helps people remember and avoid making errors when confronted with .
"Immersion brings conversion. When you inform people the same thing over and over again, when they will make the errors, then they'll keep in mind."

She also empasized the requirement for clear policies and treatments within schools, noting that lots of schools need to resolve the individuals and procedure elements of this use.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu has turned to in-class tasks and tests to counter AI-driven academic dishonesty.
"Now, I generally utilize projects to guarantee students provide original work." However, he acknowledged that managing big classes makes this approach hard.

"If you set complicated questions, trainees will not have the ability to use AI to get direct answers," he discussed.

He stressed the need for universities to train lecturers on crafting exam questions that AI can not easily resolve while acknowledging that some speakers struggle to counter AI abuse due to a lack of technological awareness. "Some speakers are analogue," he said.

- Nigeria released a draft National AI Strategy in August 2024, concentrating on ethical AI development with fairness, forums.cgb.designknights.com transparency, responsibility, and personal privacy at its core.
- UNESCO in a report requires the guideline of AI in education, encouraging institutions to audit algorithms, information, and bphomesteading.com outputs of generative AI tools to ensure they satisfy ethical requirements, protect user data, and filter improper material.
- It stresses the requirement to evaluate the long-lasting effect of AI on crucial skills like thinking and imagination while developing policies that line up with ethical structures. Additionally, UNESCO advises implementing age limitations for GenAI usage to safeguard younger students and protect susceptible groups.
- For federal governments, it advised embracing a collaborated nationwide technique to regulating GenAI, consisting of developing oversight bodies and lining up policies with existing information protection and privacy laws. It stresses examining AI dangers, systemcheck-wiki.de imposing more stringent rules for high-risk applications, and making sure nationwide information ownership.