提交 695190bd authored 作者: Thomas Mueller's avatar Thomas Mueller

Documentation.

上级 027429fd
...@@ -183,6 +183,11 @@ creating a linked table to the same database, ...@@ -183,6 +183,11 @@ creating a linked table to the same database,
and creating a linked table to another database using the server mode if the other database is open in the same server and creating a linked table to another database using the server mode if the other database is open in the same server
(use the embedded mode instead). (use the embedded mode instead).
</p> </p>
<p>
Data types that are not supported in H2 are also not supported for linked tables,
for example unsigned data types if the value is outside the range of the signed type.
In such cases, the columns needs to be cast to a supported type.
</p>
<h2 id="updatable_views">Updatable Views</h2> <h2 id="updatable_views">Updatable Views</h2>
<p> <p>
......
...@@ -18,7 +18,12 @@ Change Log ...@@ -18,7 +18,12 @@ Change Log
<h1>Change Log</h1> <h1>Change Log</h1>
<h2>Next Version (unreleased)</h2> <h2>Next Version (unreleased)</h2>
<ul><li>MERGE: if a unique key was violated (but not the primary key or the key columns of the merge itself), <ul><li>String.toUpperCase() was used a few places, which is problematic when using the Turkish locale.
The method has been replaced with toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH) to solve such problems.
</li><li>Shell tool: the built-in command "distinct" has been removed
(use the SQL statements "show tables" / "show columns from tableName" instead).
The result set formatting has been improved.
</li><li>MERGE: if a unique key was violated (but not the primary key or the key columns of the merge itself),
the wrong exception was thrown. the wrong exception was thrown.
</li><li>IBM DB2 and Apache Derby compatibility: support the pseudo-table SYSIBM.SYSDUMMY1. </li><li>IBM DB2 and Apache Derby compatibility: support the pseudo-table SYSIBM.SYSDUMMY1.
</li><li>ROWNUM() did not work in combination with IN(..). The following query did not work as expected: </li><li>ROWNUM() did not work in combination with IN(..). The following query did not work as expected:
......
Markdown 格式
0%
您添加了 0 到此讨论。请谨慎行事。
请先完成此评论的编辑!
注册 或者 后发表评论