提交 d9e6e1e4 authored 作者: Evgenij Ryazanov's avatar Evgenij Ryazanov

Improve cost calculation for multi-column indexes

上级 37047454
......@@ -168,12 +168,13 @@ public abstract class BaseIndex extends SchemaObjectBase implements Index {
int totalSelectivity = 0;
long rowsCost = rowCount;
if (masks != null) {
for (int i = 0, len = columns.length; i < len; i++) {
Column column = columns[i];
int i = 0, len = columns.length;
while (i < len) {
Column column = columns[i++];
int index = column.getColumnId();
int mask = masks[index];
if ((mask & IndexCondition.EQUALITY) == IndexCondition.EQUALITY) {
if (i == columns.length - 1 && getIndexType().isUnique()) {
if (i == len && getIndexType().isUnique()) {
rowsCost = 3;
break;
}
......@@ -185,18 +186,24 @@ public abstract class BaseIndex extends SchemaObjectBase implements Index {
}
rowsCost = 2 + Math.max(rowCount / distinctRows, 1);
} else if ((mask & IndexCondition.RANGE) == IndexCondition.RANGE) {
rowsCost = 2 + rowCount / 4;
rowsCost = 2 + rowsCost / 4;
break;
} else if ((mask & IndexCondition.START) == IndexCondition.START) {
rowsCost = 2 + rowCount / 3;
rowsCost = 2 + rowsCost / 3;
break;
} else if ((mask & IndexCondition.END) == IndexCondition.END) {
rowsCost = rowCount / 3;
rowsCost = rowsCost / 3;
break;
} else {
if (mask == 0) {
// Adjust counter of used columns (i)
i--;
}
break;
}
}
// Increase cost of indexes with additional unused columns
rowsCost += len - i;
}
// If the ORDER BY clause matches the ordering of this index,
// it will be cheaper than another index, so adjust the cost
......
......@@ -304,3 +304,43 @@ select 1 from test group by x;
drop table test;
> ok
CREATE TABLE TEST(A INT, B INT, C INT);
> ok
CREATE INDEX T_A1 ON TEST(A);
> ok
CREATE INDEX T_A_B ON TEST(A, B);
> ok
CREATE INDEX T_A_C ON TEST(A, C);
> ok
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM TEST WHERE A = 0;
>> SELECT TEST.A, TEST.B, TEST.C FROM PUBLIC.TEST /* PUBLIC.T_A1: A = 0 */ WHERE A = 0
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM TEST WHERE A = 0 AND B >= 0;
>> SELECT TEST.A, TEST.B, TEST.C FROM PUBLIC.TEST /* PUBLIC.T_A_B: A = 0 AND B >= 0 */ WHERE (A = 0) AND (B >= 0)
INSERT INTO TEST (SELECT X / 100, X, X FROM SYSTEM_RANGE(1, 3000));
> update count: 3000
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM TEST WHERE A = 0;
>> SELECT TEST.A, TEST.B, TEST.C FROM PUBLIC.TEST /* PUBLIC.T_A1: A = 0 */ WHERE A = 0
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM TEST WHERE A = 0 AND B >= 0;
>> SELECT TEST.A, TEST.B, TEST.C FROM PUBLIC.TEST /* PUBLIC.T_A_B: A = 0 AND B >= 0 */ WHERE (A = 0) AND (B >= 0)
-- Test that creation order of indexes has no effect
CREATE INDEX T_A2 ON TEST(A);
> ok
DROP INDEX T_A1;
> ok
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM TEST WHERE A = 0;
>> SELECT TEST.A, TEST.B, TEST.C FROM PUBLIC.TEST /* PUBLIC.T_A2: A = 0 */ WHERE A = 0
DROP TABLE TEST;
> ok
Markdown 格式
0%
您添加了 0 到此讨论。请谨慎行事。
请先完成此评论的编辑!
注册 或者 后发表评论