- 22 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Investigate why closing a file sometimes takes 45 seconds (see also http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4760809/closing-a-randomaccessfile-sometimes-takes-exactly-45-seconds)
-
- 20 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
TCP Server: a base directory with a prefix with a database name with prefix didn't work as expected (this only applies to non-disk and wrapped file systems).
-
- 18 1月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Version 1.3: when re-running the same query so that the previous result was re-used, and if the result set was large so that it was stored externally (in a temp file or in a temp table), then reading rows from both result sets resulted in an exception or wrong behavior.
-
- 17 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
- 16 1月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
A new sample application that shows how to create a read-only database in a zip file where the database file is split into multiple smaller parts.
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
- 15 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
- 14 1月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
The wrong error message was thrown when trying to open a database where the database file could not be read for some reason (for example because the split file system was used, and the file was split at the wrong position).
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
The wrong error message was thrown when trying to open a database where the database file could not be read for some reason (for example because the split file system was used, and the file was split at the wrong position).
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
The wrong error message was thrown when trying to open a database where the database file could not be read for some reason (for example because the split file system was used, and the file was split at the wrong position).
-
- 13 1月, 2011 8 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
The wrong error message was thrown when trying to open a database where the database file could not be read for some reason (for example because the split file system was used, and the file was split at the wrong position).
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
The scan-resistant cache type "TQ" (two queue) is again available. To use it, append ;CACHE_TYPE=TQ to the database URL.
-
- 12 1月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
The scan-resistant cache type "TQ" (two queue) is again available. To use it, append ;CACHE_TYPE=TQ to the database URL.
-
由 christian.peter.io 提交于
Opening a database with a corrupt split file must lead to a database exception, not a "Database may be already in use" exception
-
- 11 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
There was a memory leak in the trace system. Opening and closing many connections could run out of memory.
-
- 10 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
- 07 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
- 06 1月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Server tool: the tcpShutdown feature now also stops other servers (web server and PostgreSQL server).
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Lob in database: after the process was killed while adding a lob, inserting a lob could throw an exception (primary key violation in LOB_MAP).
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Lob in database: after the process was killed while adding a lob, inserting a lob could throw an exception (primary key violation in LOB_MAP).
-
- 05 1月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Multi-version concurrency: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE threw a "concurrent update" exception immediately instead of a "lock timeout" exception after the set lock timeout if the row was already locked by another connection.
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Server tool: the tcpShutdown feature now also stops other servers (web server and PostgreSQL server).
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Server tool: the tcpShutdown feature now also stops other servers (web server and PostgreSQL server).
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Multi-version concurrency: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE threw a "concurrent update" exception immediately instead of a "lock timeout" exception after the set lock timeout if the row was already locked by another connection.
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
- 03 1月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
-
由 Thomas Mueller 提交于
Multi-version concurrency: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE threw a "concurrent update" exception immediately instead of a "lock timeout" exception after the set lock timeout if the row was already locked by another connection.
-